{"id":"W2078998709","doi":"10.1007/s11881-013-0081-0","title":"Are poor Chinese text comprehenders also poor in written composition?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Dyslexia","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Comprehension; Linguistics; Syntax; Psycholinguistics; Narrative; Working memory; Reading comprehension; Exposition (narrative); Composition (language); Sentence; Psychology; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Natural language processing; Reading (process); Literature","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002031078,0.0002025585,0.0003710827,0.0002477324,0.0000499215,0.00003772307,0.0002676736,0.0001102913,0.002313282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002384808,0.0001739862,0.00009956599,0.0002875973,0.00008101841,0.0001698059,0.00005011859,0.0001786239,0.001251943],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001398189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000147493,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000806735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002264926,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984586,0.0001392403,0.0005014319,0.0003146323,0.0001959294,0.000390157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990396,0.0001289331,0.0002524464,0.0003126716,0.0001477843,0.0001185948],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002190189,0.001348328,0.5307473,0.000113113,0.0003837729,0.00008276893,0.008237869,0.0000506657,0.003084758,0.00262578,0.4308689,0.0222377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007131979,0.00006679746,0.9879853,0.000112574,0.000004871546,0.00001398281,0.0007114913,0.00008669699,0.0002827039,0.001563304,0.008231845,0.0002272323],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9673488,0.0004260654,0.00002200068,0.008859985,0.0003099114,0.0002972697,0.00002033536,0.00005036968,0.02266525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920572,0.00001361785,0.0003540653,0.004698979,0.00007107911,0.00007200971,0.00003852598,0.00002366143,0.002670836],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.457238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995257,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04625568788470075,"score_gpt":0.3535329635945149,"score_spread":0.3072772757098142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}