{"id":"W2079227481","doi":"10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.11.007","title":"Can tax convexity be ignored in corporate financing decisions?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Banking & Finance","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Convexity; Leverage (statistics); Economics; Corporate tax; Microeconomics; Tax basis; Regular polygon; Corporate finance; Schedule; Econometrics; Tax reform; Monetary economics; Financial economics; Public economics; Finance; Tax avoidance; State income tax; Mathematics; Gross income; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002047365,0.0002426018,0.0005044703,0.000427732,0.0001583853,0.0001309814,0.000480141,0.0001134269,0.00004315174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004991138,0.0002296973,0.0001541267,0.001306296,0.00007850554,0.001272438,0.00009666805,0.0005108895,0.00002511029],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001537913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001593573,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008759239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004034502,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976601,0.00001180363,0.001037381,0.0002656127,0.0005185516,0.000506571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996151,0.0001270789,0.002990118,0.0002739856,0.0004405472,0.00001729826],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007039609,0.0003367157,0.8328103,0.000117723,0.00002662713,0.003263869,0.0002697498,0.003416813,0.001802685,0.02055286,0.02359337,0.1131053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001539244,0.00004390962,0.9115443,0.0009258136,0.00002221604,0.00005293173,0.00009194227,0.0005223906,0.0003471083,0.01795906,0.06661885,0.0003322141],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907313,0.0004273166,0.005013525,0.00170405,0.0009722515,0.00012814,0.00000635298,0.00001768186,0.0009993548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952011,0.0001967515,0.00113336,0.002392412,0.0008732493,0.000001956013,0.000002707563,0.00002791237,0.0001705885],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1127731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9366783,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04001270348269152,"score_gpt":0.2380501779153872,"score_spread":0.1980374744326957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}