{"id":"W2079285503","doi":"10.1177/0734242x07082764","title":"Strategy for use of alternative waste sort sizes for characterizing solid waste composition","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Waste Management & Research The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy","topic":"Municipal Solid Waste Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Sorting; Municipal solid waste; Waste management; Solid waste management; Environmental science; Waste stream; sort; Waste treatment; Reduction (mathematics); Engineering; Computer science; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002945168,0.0009579276,0.001041066,0.003493169,0.0007338736,0.00204008,0.001343888,0.001110544,0.001563498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004238879,0.0005458643,0.0005561496,0.002033844,0.0007625852,0.001187325,0.001172629,0.00101486,0.0012573],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001125293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002196411,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005046767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01386137,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977599,0.0004850861,0.0001882605,0.0004373765,0.001016043,0.00011326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974497,0.0005780141,0.0002725161,0.0003427662,0.001261149,0.00009591225],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004981117,0.0006121756,0.01211905,0.0004471777,0.00006886016,0.0001734261,0.0003454427,0.003115375,0.7047635,0.002920518,0.001068162,0.2738682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009919898,0.001394571,0.01632096,0.00007535312,0.0001505354,0.0006692008,0.0005945123,0.02688898,0.9341877,0.00226412,0.01721409,0.0001408312],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1971128,0.0007802799,0.7879039,0.000679118,0.0001406134,0.002674862,0.001377962,0.002199703,0.007130762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1890939,0.0003130969,0.8060419,0.0001977972,0.00001564345,0.001082794,0.0005029727,0.00009147048,0.00266028],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005046767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01557571,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06811099356853671,"score_gpt":0.3409809619339076,"score_spread":0.2728699683653709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}