{"id":"W2079308528","doi":"10.1017/s0714980800015233","title":"Sociology of Aging in Canada: Issues for the Millennium","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement","topic":"Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Population ageing; Life course approach; Perspective (graphical); Context (archaeology); Social security; Inequality; Health care; Public policy; Sociological theory; Social inequality; Population; Positive economics; Economic growth; Political science; Social science; Economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001640054,0.0001712835,0.0003063269,0.0002637128,0.001284104,0.00005719665,0.0004248193,0.00005839626,0.0001700389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000419385,0.000146663,0.00009696855,0.0002598811,0.0002915637,0.00008521083,0.00001098341,0.0002720492,0.00000125112],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002552948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00420608,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999835,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980889,0.0002303467,0.0004336818,0.0002165887,0.0001297559,0.0009007172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982749,0.0004844275,0.0002263086,0.000176731,0.000239543,0.0005981331],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001407623,0.00002290367,0.1964533,0.00006016603,0.0001997056,0.0005823437,0.6506155,0.001964643,0.000008797589,0.03327144,0.108724,0.008083117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003173737,0.00003860901,0.07862189,0.0001677384,0.00002954044,0.00002741794,0.02518507,0.0001158019,0.000007498469,0.0008772512,0.8944139,0.0001978602],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9238327,0.008408167,0.00008394603,0.06450459,0.001550719,0.0003700779,0.00003142525,0.000006972476,0.001211463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927194,0.004056017,0.00005615841,0.001141018,0.0008298642,0.00002968058,0.000004001381,0.00001898221,0.001144839],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.78569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.987642,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01735747292239717,"score_gpt":0.2526859647646293,"score_spread":0.2353284918422322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}