{"id":"W2079311564","doi":"10.1016/j.jal.2011.08.003","title":"An analytic tableau calculus for a temporalised belief logic","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Soundness; Completeness (order theory); Calculus (dental); Proof calculus; Sketch; Modal logic; Computer science; Dynamic logic (digital electronics); Temporal logic; Mathematics; Natural deduction; Algorithm; Theoretical computer science; Programming language; Modal","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002279713,0.000712982,0.001002348,0.001716855,0.002228438,0.006666474,0.002505552,0.001600916,0.01191625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005090244,0.0008650743,0.002189103,0.002232914,0.003498619,0.007176175,0.002468716,0.003083143,0.00168572],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004002937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002301882,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006479681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004635358,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987054,0.0003257963,0.0001221685,0.0002095924,0.0004570078,0.0001800193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982698,0.0009916337,0.00008043529,0.0001903574,0.0003440385,0.000123678],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001004928,0.000007070046,0.00002682884,0.00001784235,0.000004766909,0.00003481227,0.00013906,0.001304797,0.0003175919,0.9947471,0.0005211959,0.002868764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001184943,0.000006979341,0.00002051824,0.00001138576,0.00001228962,0.00002769137,0.00004455064,0.01680642,0.0004069122,0.9770314,0.005607366,0.00001258192],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009254912,0.0003363622,0.9643137,0.001091416,0.0002158042,0.0001044509,0.000457022,0.0005432845,0.02368306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3818709,0.0006390737,0.5909473,0.0005253089,0.0002621995,0.0003239602,0.0006777088,0.0003392733,0.02441426],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01191625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03986382,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07666570988216673,"score_gpt":0.2869100306169845,"score_spread":0.2102443207348178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}