{"id":"W2079366015","doi":"10.1111/j.1945-5100.2004.tb00052.x","title":"Empirical and theoretical comparisons of the Chicxulub and Sudbury impact structures","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Meteoritics and Planetary Science","topic":"Planetary Science and Exploration","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Geological Survey of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Impact crater; Impact structure; Geology; Shock metamorphism; Breccia; Shock (circulatory); RADIUS; Mineralogy; Geophysics; Geochemistry; Astrobiology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002547443,0.00009487551,0.0001290732,0.00004257468,0.0002744938,0.00007983164,0.0001476925,0.00002074698,0.00002208781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001389918,0.00005682025,0.00001751977,0.0001782019,0.001619241,0.000219305,0.0000637058,0.0001154218,0.000001133497],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000353098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008018524,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001860772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001452741,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992591,0.0000236313,0.0001209835,0.0002002196,0.0002040377,0.0001920001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999617,0.00007860624,0.00003600746,0.0001253399,0.00002038255,0.0001225979],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001209786,0.00002138222,0.9229875,0.00000895496,0.00001158732,0.000001383947,0.0005636348,0.0007417715,0.002381047,0.0712128,0.00006265108,0.001995169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002137304,0.0001149692,0.9228344,0.00001225403,0.00002029608,0.00002160559,0.0002582968,0.004450338,0.0007160397,0.07107016,0.0001747006,0.0001132315],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983779,0.0002598471,0.0003967876,0.0003650199,0.00007729123,0.00007370992,0.0001050969,0.00000386454,0.0003405391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989027,0.00001901884,0.000933932,0.00007332998,0.00003770509,4.434828e-7,0.00002877879,0.000001623648,0.00000250276],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003708566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5966161,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01445201862770242,"score_gpt":0.2695170105034392,"score_spread":0.2550649918757368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}