{"id":"W2079366015","doi":"10.1111/j.1945-5100.2004.tb00052.x","title":"Empirical and theoretical comparisons of the Chicxulub and Sudbury impact structures","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Meteoritics and Planetary Science","topic":"Planetary Science and Exploration","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Geological Survey of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Impact crater; Impact structure; Geology; Shock metamorphism; Breccia; Shock (circulatory); RADIUS; Mineralogy; Geophysics; Geochemistry; Astrobiology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009013836,0.0001574709,0.000139061,0.001992251,0.00157954,0.001680866,0.0009958798,0.000322633,0.004960428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009337598,0.0002286688,0.0001595977,0.002302793,0.002703293,0.0008542211,0.001204541,0.0004463413,0.0001793552],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004758654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001292138,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2532679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3676597,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996271,0.00009721898,0.00001743318,0.00008457009,0.00008692615,0.00008682921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966305,0.001634062,0.0006858266,0.000174448,0.0005379948,0.0003371968],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006963815,0.00003117192,0.9794143,0.00002093578,0.00003819347,0.0002217008,0.001302808,0.004201947,0.0004873096,0.007857597,0.000384568,0.005969894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007164309,0.0000223977,0.9826078,0.00001988327,0.00001282855,0.0001535503,0.003617574,0.01116215,0.0002713605,0.0009530819,0.001163428,0.00000880469],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949166,0.00007766831,0.0002784076,0.00006514897,9.849687e-7,0.000008514991,0.0001617794,0.000003695456,0.004487411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995317,0.00002249447,0.0001333223,0.000002617223,7.010224e-7,0.00000291886,0.0001778561,0.000001258604,0.0001270541],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2532679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5035875,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01445201862770242,"score_gpt":0.2695170105034392,"score_spread":0.2550649918757368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}