{"id":"W2079488032","doi":"10.1175/jcli-d-12-00249.1","title":"Downscaling Extremes: An Intercomparison of Multiple Methods for Future Climate","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Climate","topic":"Climate variability and models","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Pacific Institute for Climate Solutions; University of Victoria","funders":"Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations","keywords":"Downscaling; Climatology; Environmental science; Precipitation; Climate change; Coupled model intercomparison project; Climate model; Climate extremes; General Circulation Model; Baseline (sea); Variation (astronomy); Meteorology; Atmospheric sciences; Geography; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00403475,0.0001577702,0.0004509344,0.00006506449,0.000104717,0.00002458915,0.0002989308,0.0001092634,0.0004524606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001499484,0.0001213273,0.0002548795,0.0001127562,0.00008472805,0.00090183,0.0001481513,0.0001955702,0.00001177091],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009346898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007860305,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001579705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001945344,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980639,0.0002127535,0.0008595125,0.0001450146,0.0002178644,0.0005009505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984401,0.0003469588,0.0006922341,0.0002474973,0.00004536903,0.0002277737],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001636875,0.00224543,0.5488269,0.0004654921,0.0001136757,0.000002476661,0.01216382,0.008076081,0.2911472,0.001768025,0.0004491338,0.1331048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0122552,0.004225936,0.2953114,0.0009555062,0.001404606,0.0005496829,0.02191542,0.2707518,0.1457725,0.008714721,0.2356409,0.002502311],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9555073,0.0002959698,0.04188883,0.000160844,0.0009153579,0.0002011981,0.00003507823,0.00001469134,0.0009807764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7923364,0.0004944295,0.2067517,0.00007693516,0.0003090359,0.000004440371,0.000004534589,0.0000181392,0.000004409213],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2626757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4954126,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05688025946366762,"score_gpt":0.3762955198232455,"score_spread":0.3194152603595779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}