{"id":"W2079528074","doi":"10.5539/mas.v2n2p3","title":"Theoretical Analysis of Closed Rankine Cycle Solar Pond Power Generator","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Applied Science","topic":"Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems","field":"Energy","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Organic Rankine cycle; Working fluid; Parabolic trough; Evaporator; Condenser (optics); Rankine cycle; Thermal energy; Environmental science; Degree Rankine; Heat exchanger; Combined cycle; Turbine; Solar energy; Thermodynamics; Nuclear engineering; Thermodynamic cycle; Mechanical engineering; Waste heat; Thermal; Engineering; Physics; Power (physics); Electrical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002197683,0.0003633126,0.0005904298,0.0006341856,0.000809376,0.001083006,0.0008378368,0.0009349033,0.01217027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006612319,0.0003027981,0.0004876786,0.000440559,0.001097221,0.000939635,0.000557728,0.0005216509,0.0008475056],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009807952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005263913,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001990897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001356596,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998566,0.0000331928,0.000003090107,0.00002052808,0.00006150797,0.00002501327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998215,0.00009296856,0.00001849244,0.00001093408,0.00004294149,0.00001329726],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007010727,0.00003733496,0.0006154117,0.000175285,0.00002036183,0.0004515766,0.0002434221,0.5849421,0.003506159,0.3965824,0.002157478,0.01119824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001259147,0.00002954414,0.000271878,0.00001410137,0.000006150599,0.00009770664,0.00004379958,0.9445727,0.0004145455,0.05203237,0.002494599,0.0000099301],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1403681,0.00469777,0.4903885,0.001260096,0.0002095152,0.0001271251,0.0004257853,0.0003655411,0.3621575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9673637,0.0007205449,0.005582359,0.00004990604,0.00006256582,0.00007472497,0.00007205308,0.00004819916,0.02602591],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01217027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04071367,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01160712559321507,"score_gpt":0.2229771067990246,"score_spread":0.2113699812058096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}