{"id":"W2079575069","doi":"10.1080/10894160.2012.627501","title":"Schulman's Urban Lesbian: A HoboSexual Pedestrian Rhetoric","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Lesbian Studies","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Lesbian; Vision; Queer; Gender studies; Human sexuality; Rhetoric; Sociology; Sexual identity; Identity (music); Reading (process); Aesthetics; Political science; Art; Law; Anthropology; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001222192,0.0002864569,0.0007174816,0.0004405754,0.0003842158,0.00005160616,0.0003767863,0.0001738765,0.0002239583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003473638,0.0002361718,0.0002717793,0.0003708223,0.0002148328,0.0004711648,0.00009828843,0.0006558066,0.0005861621],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002513537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001458743,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003111297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001413143,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972115,0.0003423096,0.0009221041,0.0001905891,0.0004720996,0.0008614085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977863,0.0002709464,0.0007969307,0.0003496594,0.0003485675,0.0004475535],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001426953,0.0004982933,0.4587639,0.0003443709,0.0008407526,0.0001174377,0.01885223,6.789434e-7,0.00003478233,0.004356822,0.5065787,0.009469288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002820048,0.001011155,0.5889347,0.00011464,0.0005842018,0.001076149,0.0164542,3.73991e-7,0.00001159715,0.0007978681,0.3876587,0.0005364565],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8029376,0.1376836,0.00003696342,0.005837339,0.01182103,0.0001951049,0.00001501702,0.00004821406,0.04142516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9611914,0.004822763,0.0002067692,0.0005579824,0.01191216,0.000007350953,0.000001070935,0.0000448476,0.02125568],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1582538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9630807,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1682794756199175,"score_gpt":0.4585517879380346,"score_spread":0.2902723123181171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}