{"id":"W2079575069","doi":"10.1080/10894160.2012.627501","title":"Schulman's Urban Lesbian: A HoboSexual Pedestrian Rhetoric","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Lesbian Studies","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Lesbian; Vision; Queer; Gender studies; Human sexuality; Rhetoric; Sociology; Sexual identity; Identity (music); Reading (process); Aesthetics; Political science; Art; Law; Anthropology; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002122374,0.0003459268,0.0002291121,0.0005877334,0.01179896,0.003874139,0.0005036156,0.002804043,0.00525632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002434786,0.0001965225,0.0001829677,0.0005088773,0.01417065,0.002447831,0.002989552,0.00567711,0.000581252],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005327223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002205352,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02637854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06352665,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981015,0.001409025,0.00002179537,0.0001264381,0.0001499713,0.0001912979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990463,0.0006502966,0.00007453551,0.00002951663,0.00009488747,0.0001044685],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002899544,0.00002542536,0.0007712186,0.00006611965,0.000005170497,0.0002143536,0.08998072,0.00004974161,0.0001661506,0.8546212,0.04769617,0.006374639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001732142,0.00004756145,0.001209293,0.0003915525,0.00001177475,0.0002153836,0.1074903,0.0001501722,0.0004448302,0.03723376,0.8527711,0.00001696195],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09081139,0.01399623,0.003858069,0.3713693,0.002171504,0.00006330226,0.00007931588,0.00007002278,0.5175808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8343037,0.003447269,0.0007866743,0.05822708,0.0008419448,0.0001090109,0.00001968176,0.00006262174,0.102202],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02637854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05245,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1682794756199175,"score_gpt":0.4585517879380346,"score_spread":0.2902723123181171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}