{"id":"W2079805756","doi":"10.1049/el.2009.0822","title":"Proper interpretation of source excitations for resolving ostensible excessive power gains of metamaterial resonances","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electronics Letters","topic":"Antenna Design and Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Metamaterial; Interpretation (philosophy); Homogeneous; Power (physics); Physics; Causality (physics); Effective radiated power; Isotropy; Boundary value problem; Boundary (topology); Dipole; Theoretical physics; Optics; Computer science; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Statistical physics; Quantum mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047279,0.0004369055,0.0003347959,0.0004528638,0.0004546136,0.0008652959,0.0005482694,0.001010685,0.002424315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001333522,0.0002495516,0.0002503371,0.0001953878,0.001088974,0.001375533,0.0007250209,0.0008265616,0.0005528569],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001758888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000190706,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003929958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006125229,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998398,0.00004913131,0.000009153819,0.00002774424,0.00005160131,0.00002256475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997445,0.0001128673,0.00002138287,0.00007233153,0.00003332234,0.00001564712],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001752457,0.00004018135,0.0004798168,0.0002238647,0.000009356206,0.0005828908,0.0005335514,0.009957037,0.2413429,0.7082188,0.0008622617,0.03757403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005475411,0.0001049492,0.0008833572,0.00008096526,0.00002508526,0.0008863321,0.0005001169,0.2785361,0.1432087,0.5660189,0.009651178,0.00004953245],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07322679,0.0003035255,0.9103598,0.0005373533,0.0001506795,0.00004200075,0.00003742284,0.0003322011,0.01501027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7770234,0.0006452044,0.2180486,0.0001609319,0.00008954031,0.00009485216,0.00005372017,0.0002118315,0.00367186],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002424315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008110166,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007911579025716901,"score_gpt":0.2241257192007724,"score_spread":0.2162141401750555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}