{"id":"W2079809016","doi":"10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.01.031","title":"A cohesive zone model for fatigue crack growth allowing for crack retardation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Solids and Structures","topic":"Mechanical Behavior of Composites","field":"Engineering","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Materials science; Paris' law; Structural engineering; Finite element method; Traction (geology); Cohesive zone model; Crack closure; Aluminium; Stress concentration; Fatigue testing; Stress (linguistics); Fracture mechanics; Composite material; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001039765,0.0001099197,0.0001800424,0.0001027678,0.00003835874,0.0000831144,0.0001971824,0.0000629921,0.0000079427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007903217,0.00009498722,0.0001195707,0.00002105208,0.00001217205,0.0002355507,0.000009399968,0.0001055381,1.299807e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003976398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001474374,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":8.334044e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001120022,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992301,0.000005943123,0.0003387099,0.00008223787,0.0002292331,0.0001137687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992701,0.00009303356,0.0001086429,0.0000456449,0.0004164792,0.00006607994],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00116273,0.00009387964,0.0005489443,0.0001343962,0.0008442323,0.00003669937,0.001735794,0.2986125,0.4828754,0.1143755,0.00781224,0.09176768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001894574,0.0003623097,0.004309552,0.0001108021,0.0001136161,0.0001052921,0.00003703836,0.7505798,0.05499641,0.1868361,0.000386595,0.0002678245],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3786604,0.0001629849,0.6199,0.0006748646,0.0003748906,0.0001301295,0.00003725629,0.00001784402,0.00004159432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9466611,0.00005362402,0.05273877,0.000170983,0.0003286445,0.000003708073,0.00001356483,0.00001206352,0.00001755359],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5680007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3873466,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02442925507940399,"score_gpt":0.291612575075585,"score_spread":0.267183319996181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}