{"id":"W2079809016","doi":"10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.01.031","title":"A cohesive zone model for fatigue crack growth allowing for crack retardation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Solids and Structures","topic":"Mechanical Behavior of Composites","field":"Engineering","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Materials science; Paris' law; Structural engineering; Finite element method; Traction (geology); Cohesive zone model; Crack closure; Aluminium; Stress concentration; Fatigue testing; Stress (linguistics); Fracture mechanics; Composite material; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003510738,0.0008288524,0.0008762768,0.0006493896,0.0006646399,0.000964227,0.002518875,0.002471934,0.004637757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001130378,0.0007045383,0.0009278741,0.0006023085,0.0006050835,0.001919289,0.0009056614,0.001281557,0.001142345],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005346832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007658836,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008478149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006995844,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998846,0.00002302018,0.000006553747,0.00001915241,0.00004865905,0.00001799709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997664,0.00007276575,0.00002246322,0.00004258592,0.00007380825,0.00002203181],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003046421,0.00005578677,0.0001654994,0.00005874034,0.0000183449,0.000153468,0.00006205294,0.9088519,0.007134418,0.07665968,0.0009040738,0.00590558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007705031,0.000005864396,0.00002890391,0.000002592844,0.000004245638,0.000009510897,0.000003704926,0.9955106,0.0002559987,0.003657924,0.0005075939,0.000005342375],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06268169,0.001545199,0.906125,0.0005478674,0.0003779715,0.000116333,0.0003611216,0.000515239,0.02772958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8255717,0.001625661,0.1234449,0.0002428863,0.0002057741,0.0003407368,0.0003389116,0.000559455,0.04767],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008478149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01685756,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02442925507940399,"score_gpt":0.291612575075585,"score_spread":0.267183319996181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}