{"id":"W2079947475","doi":"10.1007/s10677-011-9327-2","title":"A Capability Approach to Justice as a Virtue","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethical Theory and Moral Practice","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of medicine; Political philosophy; Virtue; Sociology; Economic Justice; Capability approach; Law and economics; Construct (python library); Epistemology; Politics; Transcendental number; Environmental ethics; Social justice; Ontology; Law; Political science; Computer science; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01273877,0.0001259994,0.0001711897,0.00003153758,0.0007834657,0.00006919473,0.0002529356,0.0005949187,0.0001584873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05833559,0.0001117853,0.00005472237,0.0002163012,0.001401206,0.0004515983,0.0001196195,0.001845492,0.0002441666],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003951895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002017436,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001566826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001986863,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994478,0.004163506,0.0001941996,0.0003630268,0.0004050363,0.0003962279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924764,0.006402055,0.00005344689,0.0002389927,0.0001819295,0.0006471514],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007150069,0.000225451,0.00000573031,0.0000287434,0.00001534918,0.000009822119,0.04268368,6.67249e-7,0.00001157948,0.9556341,0.0001066065,0.0005632855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001190535,0.0001267867,0.0001383852,0.000009347247,0.0001166468,0.00001043816,0.01291181,0.000004248383,0.00003359584,0.9359053,0.05046009,0.0001643035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008951604,0.00005426636,0.00357857,0.03661013,0.0002250765,0.0002565338,0.000004712593,0.00009536495,0.9502237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9466745,0.00002576141,0.004055852,0.04809297,0.0003610568,0.00002052443,7.139772e-7,0.000009081484,0.0007595752],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9494641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9495965,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1457638593096164,"score_gpt":0.4028341475904127,"score_spread":0.2570702882807964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}