{"id":"W2080066834","doi":"10.1029/2002ja009721","title":"Magnetospheric disturbance induced equatorial plasma bubble development and dynamics: A case study in Brazilian sector","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres","topic":"Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":208,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo","keywords":"Electrojet; Geology; Substorm; Ionosphere; Magnetic dip; Geophysics; Equator; Atmospheric sciences; Latitude; Plasma; Magnetosphere; Earth's magnetic field; Geodesy; Physics; Magnetic field","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003085818,0.0001802551,0.0001660701,0.0005252938,0.0005642255,0.0004614816,0.0002700656,0.0004239088,0.0005376585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00115004,0.0001453296,0.000169791,0.0008231257,0.0004430047,0.0002721064,0.0005443998,0.0001496254,0.00005014472],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001025918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006035469,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1298724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1754608,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998701,0.00002622964,0.00001049929,0.00001910189,0.00002660466,0.0000475489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996334,0.0000904312,0.0001285307,0.00002761093,0.00005414786,0.00006582305],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001648376,0.0001115741,0.9203411,0.0001694958,0.00003959734,0.02437667,0.01416644,0.0007273996,0.005349989,0.0007852511,0.0004584088,0.03330924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001122334,0.0001726679,0.9652404,0.00004831218,0.00004118338,0.009625377,0.01761948,0.001518289,0.0006130489,0.0002092169,0.004881934,0.00001899096],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984021,0.0002733286,0.00009553629,0.00008232029,0.000001238886,0.00001129023,0.00005134183,0.000002918407,0.001079924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993112,0.0003458667,0.00009634681,0.0000142781,0.000001403521,0.000002862718,0.00003575707,0.000001120155,0.0001911183],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1298724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2582329,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02451440993397233,"score_gpt":0.3013599861681194,"score_spread":0.2768455762341471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}