{"id":"W2080136291","doi":"10.1177/154193120204600364","title":"Validating Methods in Cognitive Engineering: A Comparison of Two Work Domain Models","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Domain (mathematical analysis); Scope (computer science); Abstraction; Domain model; Reliability (semiconductor); Domain analysis; Work (physics); Hierarchy; Process (computing); Software engineering; Cognition; Systems engineering; Domain knowledge; Programming language; Software system; Engineering; Software","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1095448,0.001409466,0.001165838,0.008635438,0.001761036,0.00922441,0.003859651,0.002946044,0.002271282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28448,0.001157935,0.002170521,0.004398941,0.005893781,0.01072713,0.006881604,0.003161098,0.0005585603],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006329821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006233172,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004105008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00311546,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8519659,0.1099112,0.006163312,0.003842906,0.0267123,0.001404352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5312459,0.3825441,0.01301062,0.04811259,0.02293388,0.002152872],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001618734,0.001462759,0.03970202,0.002647192,0.001057633,0.0001991668,0.03144803,0.05162658,0.003582669,0.3413189,0.002565879,0.5227704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001160209,0.002868983,0.04081577,0.005309426,0.0006212094,0.0008162404,0.01895352,0.4314423,0.009043979,0.4356682,0.0528033,0.0004968575],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1045711,0.00238085,0.8685741,0.002348012,0.0002421617,0.001105784,0.0002184917,0.0009579033,0.01960159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4775055,0.00101271,0.5175911,0.0004270484,0.00005062866,0.001977555,0.0003365009,0.000356945,0.0007421813],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1095448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5793352,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07778938242746591,"score_gpt":0.3823810173699286,"score_spread":0.3045916349424627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}