{"id":"W2080145151","doi":"10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.05.017","title":"Novel scales based on hydrophobicity indices for secondary protein structure","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Biology","topic":"Cognitive Science and Mapping","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Protein secondary structure; Set (abstract data type); Index (typography); Fuzzy logic; Biological system; Mathematics; Contrast (vision); Range (aeronautics); Computer science; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Biology; Biochemistry; Materials science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001372828,0.0006338523,0.0006189042,0.001986637,0.0003875402,0.001564168,0.0008170813,0.0006178896,0.001552171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006262952,0.0002476238,0.0003988588,0.001252924,0.0006700928,0.002842366,0.0009413191,0.001148354,0.0005501607],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005622451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003167677,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006587232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010486,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993617,0.0001271968,0.00004808103,0.0001340153,0.0002796827,0.00004925792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965221,0.001584865,0.0004069225,0.0003787899,0.0007482315,0.0003590968],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001144318,0.0005356725,0.02838542,0.0005278864,0.0002845372,0.0003628681,0.0006180517,0.02922279,0.1617863,0.06860881,0.0115034,0.6970199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001064752,0.0005271623,0.0431222,0.00006921327,0.0001646926,0.0004114599,0.0003296694,0.8578318,0.02839002,0.06257012,0.006246968,0.0002302318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.2201167,0.001245035,0.7707961,0.0003683411,0.0003449247,0.0001418149,0.0005586088,0.001704683,0.004723814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7122393,0.0004226344,0.2847747,0.00008200653,0.0003003406,0.0001191232,0.0004788915,0.000285173,0.001297905],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001986637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007260323,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0103659543940664,"score_gpt":0.2747502232915595,"score_spread":0.2643842688974931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}