{"id":"W2080157152","doi":"10.1111/j.1475-4991.2010.00377.x","title":"THE GROWTH OF FAMILY EARNINGS INEQUALITY IN CANADA, 1980–2005","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Income and Wealth","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Assortative mating; Economics; Inequality; Educational attainment; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Distribution (mathematics); Demography; Sociology; Population; Economic growth","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007490663,0.0003322522,0.0003409622,0.004570772,0.002446826,0.001832578,0.000947634,0.0003269893,0.002061396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00279289,0.00017347,0.0003945639,0.01251337,0.0007098845,0.0006139064,0.0008040511,0.0006785567,0.0001815109],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07099801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05908411,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9978335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984213,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991964,0.00003049298,0.00003128936,0.00008994639,0.0004280006,0.0002239719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974746,0.0001005238,0.0003816803,0.00004858007,0.001619204,0.0003754294],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003318729,0.00007427974,0.7440638,0.0004987745,0.0002467009,0.0007276066,0.005090473,0.002323979,0.0005898958,0.008642245,0.03341648,0.2039939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004768753,0.000008264597,0.9755577,0.00009827936,0.00002357483,0.00009146379,0.0009291818,0.000557424,0.0001123384,0.0001694239,0.02242885,0.00001863593],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8578484,0.05729078,0.0007955647,0.007877886,0.0002191463,0.00007565734,0.03974992,0.0001172095,0.03602545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.967246,0.01846364,0.0007105739,0.0003756487,0.00007382795,0.00002038497,0.006561536,0.00001694521,0.00653141],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07099801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5151291,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01647160675627728,"score_gpt":0.298405766597695,"score_spread":0.2819341598414177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}