{"id":"W2080264995","doi":"10.1080/01638530902959901","title":"Understanding Verbal Irony: Clues From Interpretation of Direct and Indirect Ironic Remarks","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Processes","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Irony; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Perception; Interpretation (philosophy); Counterfactual thinking; Statement (logic); Face (sociological concept); Linguistics; Social psychology; Sarcasm; Pragmatics; Indirect speech; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy; History","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001804627,0.0003873988,0.0001994928,0.0009956098,0.0006667693,0.002348077,0.0003412025,0.001050199,0.001633391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01319434,0.0003224559,0.0001632865,0.0002327731,0.00273265,0.003367994,0.001646566,0.001272798,0.0001416848],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003554113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002604386,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004710464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008466492,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991767,0.0004577655,0.00003355944,0.00007934429,0.0001833212,0.00006932151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944084,0.003603074,0.001023619,0.0003022398,0.000437256,0.0002253466],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001813002,0.0003506258,0.1124914,0.0007063012,0.00007032367,0.002900411,0.6064686,0.0006428487,0.1604804,0.0419483,0.0008943585,0.07123349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001722784,0.001463891,0.4608355,0.0006117139,0.0001775349,0.004927509,0.3677138,0.009041814,0.02938489,0.1102277,0.01521631,0.000227071],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879094,0.0001855291,0.003259931,0.0002958166,0.00001336861,0.00001216822,0.000009467702,0.00001339251,0.008301048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984611,0.00006347396,0.001166244,0.00004663466,0.000008268021,0.000005827812,0.00001294741,0.000005953591,0.0002296584],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002348077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009543836,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03040161658876743,"score_gpt":0.315692277819841,"score_spread":0.2852906612310736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}