{"id":"W2080286430","doi":"10.1057/jird.2010.9","title":"The social purpose of new governance: Lisbon and the limits to legitimacy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Relations and Development","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Embeddedness; Neoliberalism (international relations); Legitimacy; Corporate governance; Hegemony; Context (archaeology); Economic system; Political economy; European union; Pledge; Economics; Political science; Politics; Sociology; International trade; Social science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007270594,0.00004144049,0.00008378414,0.00002847169,0.0009200939,0.00006565094,0.0001354958,0.00003532195,0.00001734514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000736737,0.00002116912,0.00003400677,0.00007360085,0.0002681619,0.0001128405,0.00004126068,0.000149449,0.000002263323],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003254921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003249946,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001775936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008852099,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992584,0.00002607499,0.0002623952,0.00003839256,0.0003389415,0.00007580091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991679,0.0002823193,0.0002332064,0.00002108043,0.000244457,0.00005104899],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001170262,0.00002252822,0.005072252,0.000001401387,0.0001386336,7.290801e-7,0.08450403,0.000003757395,0.00003314319,0.7723575,0.01444008,0.1233089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007288684,0.00001512325,0.2361437,0.00002069363,0.00001188988,0.000005649694,0.006355654,0.000005120861,0.00004198624,0.01903797,0.737577,0.00005629096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6420878,0.0007933167,0.0004403841,0.2498184,0.00241991,0.0003199275,0.000005100733,0.000006748145,0.1041085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871114,0.001027821,0.001320113,0.0002398786,0.0008860955,0.000003528319,2.146192e-7,0.000002772511,0.009408208],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7533196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7076712,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02537642432368674,"score_gpt":0.3514087782759274,"score_spread":0.3260323539522407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}