{"id":"W2080318223","doi":"10.1016/j.ejop.2012.08.006","title":"Using DNA-barcoding for sorting out protist species complexes: A case study of the Nebela tincta–collaris–bohemica group (Amoebozoa; Arcellinida, Hyalospheniidae)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Protistology","topic":"Protist diversity and phylogeny","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; DNA barcoding; Taxonomy (biology); Protist; Testate amoebae; Phylogenetic tree; Zoology; Species complex; Systematics; Ecology; Evolutionary biology; Botany; Peat; Genetics; Gene","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001428982,0.000232645,0.0004084133,0.00005693248,0.0004050709,0.00002620294,0.0005747001,0.00007656869,0.00001995823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003094263,0.0001886351,0.0002533219,0.0001010919,0.000264166,0.00001749694,0.0003749373,0.0002991951,0.000002809281],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000364155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000740762,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002463136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005526872,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974222,0.0008872832,0.0008225308,0.0002446123,0.000194243,0.0004291239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979862,0.00005905522,0.001196217,0.0003600813,0.0002595657,0.0001388759],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000493558,0.001082449,0.3880619,0.0001739677,0.0004099123,0.0005331008,0.004533737,0.0001021599,0.6025206,0.0002353412,0.00111249,0.0007408049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03072716,0.02397408,0.3322861,0.0009230366,0.003197358,0.07003287,0.04714908,0.0003629391,0.4109292,0.0005116863,0.07623246,0.003674054],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9875852,0.0003388847,0.009369211,0.00005044734,0.0006909427,0.001350578,0.00002172716,0.000005467937,0.0005875758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925376,0.000005644174,0.006286362,0.00008235039,0.0008595734,0.000009020341,0.000005226622,0.0000400348,0.0001741574],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1915914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7692317,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07523298936285634,"score_gpt":0.2894123307073388,"score_spread":0.2141793413444825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}