{"id":"W2080331648","doi":"10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13810.x","title":"How useful is the concept of habitat? – a critique","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oikos","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Argument (complex analysis); Appeal; Value (mathematics); Class (philosophy); Population; Ecology; Epistemology; Point (geometry); Geography; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Computer science; Biology; Political science; Mathematics; Philosophy; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007640369,0.00004449944,0.00005940452,0.000005542634,0.00009300256,0.000006985866,0.0001046998,0.00002863052,0.0006726942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003785016,0.00003046869,0.00002913375,0.00005015729,0.0003096634,0.0000882095,0.00005615666,0.00005353388,0.0001294949],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002055648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002797117,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001497392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008423889,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996598,0.00002561765,0.00006317459,0.00008759428,0.00007232146,0.00009153812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997623,0.00007748331,0.00003412238,0.0001047309,0.000006669452,0.00001468318],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001667791,0.0002185692,0.8005788,0.00001292398,0.00008351151,0.000004454337,0.01673532,0.001363722,0.003005713,0.02628015,0.1342336,0.01746652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005531871,0.0001330737,0.8322411,0.00001126184,0.00003335276,0.000009068599,0.001668606,0.003737673,0.01068351,0.005928773,0.1447622,0.0002381549],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.899491,0.0002250003,0.0008626564,0.05756908,0.00008734917,0.000171149,0.00001232878,0.00002084282,0.04156066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907665,0.00001846471,0.0005795615,0.00198326,0.0000195396,0.00001239328,6.12633e-7,0.000002891778,0.006616793],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09127555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.736553,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008805602190910467,"score_gpt":0.2363708963339901,"score_spread":0.2275652941430797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}