{"id":"W2080337766","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2753.2005.00582.x","title":"Diabetic patients with prior specialist care have better glycaemic control than those with prior primary care","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice","topic":"Primary Care and Health Outcomes","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute; Mount Sinai Hospital; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; University of Toronto","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Medicine; Propensity score matching; Referral; Confounding; Primary care; Diabetes mellitus; Specialist care; Emergency medicine; Internal medicine; Family medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007635419,0.0002928954,0.0009788228,0.0002389647,0.0004553976,0.0000401377,0.0003068165,0.0003880385,0.0004049802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007704951,0.0001991149,0.0001807605,0.0002427517,0.0001264069,0.001412439,0.00007301753,0.002827554,0.00009652445],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002826957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006804489,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000064024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009209595,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9894148,0.004469614,0.003055405,0.0003967546,0.002086465,0.0005769974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9794452,0.0104399,0.00381295,0.0004892137,0.005466352,0.0003464397],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006548864,0.0005089002,0.8827866,0.0003436345,0.0001262941,0.00003437567,0.005631292,0.00008180587,0.00000146309,0.00001687053,0.005085451,0.09883442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02218543,0.001733685,0.8681587,0.0007217125,0.000808555,0.000009994164,0.004940843,0.0000304162,0.000001357604,0.00003147794,0.1011307,0.000247129],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9452962,0.002000704,0.0001863386,0.02975087,0.001491578,0.003022674,0.00004448226,0.00002470799,0.0181825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9369503,0.0002389367,0.009920317,0.04971413,0.002838499,0.00008535728,0.00005946725,0.00005209622,0.0001409144],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09858729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999473,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0756650545943193,"score_gpt":0.5005081446195259,"score_spread":0.4248430900252066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}