{"id":"W2080355681","doi":"10.1111/j.0008-4085.2006.00362.x","title":"The politics of pollution: party regimes and air quality in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Air pollution; Government (linguistics); Air quality index; Pollution; Affect (linguistics); Political science; Power (physics); Environmental quality; Political economy; Public administration; Public economics; Economics; Geography; Law; Sociology; Meteorology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001146089,0.00009418007,0.0002979634,0.0001117514,0.0003144534,0.00004118251,0.0002004656,0.00007577019,0.00002533446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002963471,0.00009203897,0.00005449189,0.00009230422,0.0002957935,0.0001558519,0.000005697043,0.0001441973,5.546532e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003577557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0115734,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9998473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999994,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998327,0.0002078377,0.0007602199,0.0001095688,0.000004851229,0.0005905369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982191,0.000311865,0.0004097971,0.0001340467,0.0001392403,0.0007859519],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005837158,0.000001948795,0.1140269,0.000008825989,0.000009902946,0.000007593086,0.0004214075,0.000517646,0.00000137008,0.8840842,0.0006465362,0.0002677575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004996512,0.0000994986,0.2523253,0.00007876264,0.0000209283,0.00003073773,0.004129616,0.0001751597,0.00008485518,0.6297514,0.1124826,0.0003215563],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9832135,0.0003980368,0.000001997809,0.01360172,0.0005008508,0.0001123594,0.00006453502,0.000001042793,0.002105968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986394,0.00002739497,0.00001532708,0.000253479,0.0004162603,0.00000325978,0.000001653209,0.000007774493,0.0006354753],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2543329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9940301,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1141635850283254,"score_gpt":0.2382504446852824,"score_spread":0.124086859656957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}