{"id":"W2080355681","doi":"10.1111/j.0008-4085.2006.00362.x","title":"The politics of pollution: party regimes and air quality in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Air pollution; Government (linguistics); Air quality index; Pollution; Affect (linguistics); Political science; Power (physics); Environmental quality; Political economy; Public administration; Public economics; Economics; Geography; Law; Sociology; Meteorology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001303707,0.0001940936,0.0004475361,0.001570514,0.005490433,0.002810996,0.0007564292,0.0006743023,0.006543458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004931549,0.0001553666,0.0003418245,0.00464444,0.001999466,0.0004337156,0.001405267,0.0008416008,0.0003054264],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05466532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05476098,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9962852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983988,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980375,0.0002094444,0.00003752068,0.0001538826,0.0006819534,0.0008797302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965628,0.0005678538,0.0006674039,0.00009126902,0.001312033,0.0007986171],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003474001,0.0001512493,0.9243251,0.0001191927,0.0001022693,0.0001923384,0.007248332,0.001899129,0.0006187461,0.02093719,0.01014494,0.03391425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002564186,0.00002295733,0.9798364,0.00004000008,0.00003197865,0.00001879795,0.005827145,0.001287285,0.0001869776,0.0008362608,0.01186412,0.00002240196],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9705976,0.000831564,0.0001577247,0.003067399,0.00001969272,0.0000346982,0.001394687,0.000008802696,0.02388789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947291,0.0003228939,0.000075781,0.000093503,0.000004510525,0.000006522985,0.0003049638,0.000003967657,0.004458729],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05466532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3966265,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1141635850283254,"score_gpt":0.2382504446852824,"score_spread":0.124086859656957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}