{"id":"W2080360501","doi":"10.1006/jmaa.2001.7518","title":"On Mixed Duality in Mathematical Programming","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications","topic":"Optimization and Variational Analysis","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Dual polyhedron; Mathematics; Duality (order theory); Fractional programming; Class (philosophy); Strong duality; Dual (grammatical number); Type (biology); Nonlinear programming; Applied mathematics; Pure mathematics; Nonlinear system; Algebra over a field; Calculus (dental); Mathematical optimization; Optimization problem; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006576973,0.001365151,0.002204764,0.002640462,0.001781021,0.004721405,0.001792754,0.001988061,0.005333326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0147357,0.001225846,0.001920491,0.002950264,0.005402735,0.009085961,0.004677685,0.008217388,0.0007301866],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001945222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001078738,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008787844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008118593,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968671,0.002073761,0.0001351324,0.0002649671,0.0005164361,0.0001425426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926444,0.005664608,0.0003195488,0.0004393611,0.0006039811,0.0003281321],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001652039,0.00001791798,0.00006977755,0.00005075733,0.00001281662,0.00001883952,0.00005959814,0.001574028,0.0001087351,0.9926581,0.001157526,0.004255495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006406457,0.00001131638,0.00004672428,0.00002712115,0.000007028022,0.00002659772,0.00001953465,0.01307169,0.00006789583,0.9833444,0.003365331,0.000005886301],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01970565,0.01457063,0.8877506,0.007846191,0.001409121,0.00006207458,0.000170349,0.0001023819,0.06838299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58546,0.01651694,0.3418129,0.003343001,0.004698111,0.0005570009,0.0004402883,0.0004897874,0.04668204],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006576973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03478277,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01817083893732815,"score_gpt":0.2877184730202256,"score_spread":0.2695476340828975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}