{"id":"W2080426379","doi":"10.1520/jte102368","title":"Crack Size Evaluation Using Unloading Compliance in Single-Specimen Single-Edge-Notched Tension Fracture Toughness Testing","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Testing and Evaluation","topic":"Fatigue and fracture mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Materials science; Fracture toughness; Composite material; Tension (geology); Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution; Compact tension specimen; Toughness; Fracture (geology); Fracture mechanics; Ultimate tensile strength; Crack growth resistance curve; Crack closure; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001251364,0.000425465,0.0003589205,0.00105703,0.0003148991,0.0002262246,0.000682431,0.0005077012,0.00230425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003322384,0.0003982647,0.0002887339,0.0004105062,0.0005321773,0.0004290442,0.0006089256,0.0002981687,0.0002756505],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002379148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002182379,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00136019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005027669,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991647,0.00007218047,0.00008381742,0.0001642578,0.0004616914,0.00005329731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955252,0.001536188,0.0008640248,0.0005333102,0.001337452,0.0002036975],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000184005,0.00006840322,0.01386689,0.00007699418,0.00001003395,0.0001373603,0.0003013835,0.002041498,0.9705848,0.000040522,0.00003557499,0.01265255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000217817,0.0009526133,0.1687032,0.00002396108,0.00002397018,0.0003264852,0.0002845485,0.0355835,0.7935302,0.00004835445,0.0004503513,0.00005120386],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.985865,0.00005599275,0.01352588,0.000005892549,0.000005754138,0.00005055407,0.00008510723,0.0000941716,0.0003116551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912311,0.00002848832,0.008212697,0.000005786937,0.000001354535,0.00004206103,0.00009336134,0.00002765837,0.0003574871],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00230425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00770849,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1853000424744697,"score_gpt":0.326471309491547,"score_spread":0.1411712670170773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}