{"id":"W2080502037","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2007.11.3.213","title":"<i>R</i> v <i>Khelawon</i> —Continuing Reform of the Law of Hearsay in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"he","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Law; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006554282,0.0003525794,0.0007791503,0.001853479,0.02868783,0.01361344,0.004643536,0.01075332,0.01192042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01876646,0.0008204069,0.0007876607,0.002425199,0.0108255,0.003746379,0.004295228,0.01303448,0.0006027234],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1847863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4492455,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9967448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983566,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9914171,0.0007079383,0.0002541474,0.0006664313,0.003019588,0.003934932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877688,0.002739902,0.0004154425,0.0003096225,0.0053878,0.003378454],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001679414,0.0001159696,0.006185681,0.0003569851,0.00005495735,0.0008846422,0.01344676,0.001443623,0.001991587,0.7821288,0.1439765,0.04924655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000215916,0.00008820486,0.02287795,0.0005959956,0.0001124261,0.0001897444,0.02185105,0.003503786,0.002416528,0.05410715,0.8936555,0.0003856424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1457699,0.01241259,0.004562254,0.5472909,0.003792616,0.0003964573,0.0008669492,0.0002395166,0.2846688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7112474,0.0053415,0.006095835,0.08391994,0.0006439052,0.0001208908,0.0002166921,0.0001745149,0.1922393],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1847863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9455323,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08338161060927719,"score_gpt":0.3579884174372023,"score_spread":0.2746068068279252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}