{"id":"W2080520080","doi":"10.1353/pbm.0.0079","title":"Making the Grade: Assuring Trustworthiness in Evidence","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives in biology and medicine","topic":"Healthcare cost, quality, practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Normative; Context (archaeology); Evidence-based medicine; Interpretation (philosophy); Scientific evidence; Soundness; Trustworthiness; Health care; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Relevance (law); Articulation (sociology); Psychology; MEDLINE; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Computer science; Engineering; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6360382,0.002507428,0.00587199,0.0228719,0.01323196,0.03844606,0.009515059,0.02456778,0.004953729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8722415,0.003750294,0.003904213,0.009069257,0.05393511,0.04947755,0.03214576,0.0248081,0.002298147],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01454713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04421162,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006382137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004024426,"domain_scores_codex":[0.2834713,0.5147343,0.09280112,0.02568673,0.07857503,0.004731634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.08367334,0.6890032,0.05617543,0.0781623,0.08625252,0.00673327],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007871031,0.0000944185,0.01020019,0.004152798,0.001309063,0.001241568,0.04965277,0.003467244,0.0009503058,0.5381417,0.06360535,0.3263975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002865624,0.0001871226,0.001368888,0.006484119,0.0003530965,0.0004716327,0.005208205,0.004864576,0.001036279,0.9033191,0.07609562,0.0003246914],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01711467,0.02203822,0.477399,0.4122173,0.01424974,0.003641867,0.0004461177,0.00108133,0.05181172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4305236,0.009168036,0.4960681,0.04722873,0.006576505,0.005649246,0.0002968645,0.000555413,0.003933427],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3639618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4488298,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7328428287410091,"score_gpt":0.6584308737913167,"score_spread":0.07441195494969244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}