{"id":"W2080520122","doi":"10.1139/a03-010","title":"Old growth in the boreal forest: A dynamic perspective at the stand and landscape level","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Reviews","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":134,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Taiga; Disturbance (geology); Understory; Boreal; Old-growth forest; Geography; Ecology; Forest management; Forest dynamics; Fire regime; Biodiversity; Canopy; Ecosystem; Forestry; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001292059,0.0002212764,0.000238244,0.00001747555,0.0001944495,0.00003286394,0.0002678585,0.00005077299,0.0003821453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001184506,0.0001171835,0.00007754392,0.0001374645,0.0002684098,0.0001390758,0.0001350351,0.0001961811,0.0007084864],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005742221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003224141,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003800011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002323794,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981362,0.0005817303,0.0002654251,0.0003954092,0.0003171328,0.0003040697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992803,0.0001669389,0.0001113131,0.0003788741,3.081302e-7,0.00006230069],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003380446,0.0002775036,0.9617072,0.0000423399,0.00002130063,0.00004384728,0.006383317,0.00001187107,0.001456792,0.0004931256,0.01391663,0.01561223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005073121,0.0001126524,0.8983013,0.00003947402,0.00002454765,0.0001229546,0.001186712,0.000378243,0.00006409517,0.0004953464,0.09853158,0.000235791],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9545072,0.01788554,0.00003298046,0.0006478688,0.00006780503,0.00162642,0.00002024258,0.000008750843,0.02520325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920099,0.005650655,0.00007762323,0.0005585159,0.00001191881,0.0001614355,0.000006853669,0.00001890135,0.001504245],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08461495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9106396,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01039594426569842,"score_gpt":0.22525851786093,"score_spread":0.2148625735952316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}