{"id":"W2080540197","doi":"10.1007/s10926-009-9210-3","title":"A Systematic Review of Workplace Ergonomic Interventions with Economic Analyses","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","topic":"Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Work & Health; McMaster University; Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychological intervention; Systematic review; Economic evaluation; Intervention (counseling); Cost effectiveness; Diversity (politics); Evidence-based practice; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Public economics; Business; MEDLINE; Medicine; Economics; Environmental health; Risk analysis (engineering); Nursing; Alternative medicine; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01622112,0.002770839,0.01687633,0.009719058,0.001051969,0.003592276,0.002604294,0.002532456,0.006751734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07538772,0.002039105,0.01289701,0.01118812,0.001222322,0.002946638,0.002801726,0.002057689,0.0002934489],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006232493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01145724,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009170488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03141993,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9784039,0.01044555,0.00672321,0.0009234624,0.002990889,0.0005130929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.972202,0.01960574,0.005560476,0.0005383829,0.001762261,0.0003312007],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001205365,0.0000479119,0.0005943018,0.9261908,0.0458473,0.0001504269,0.0001327228,0.0002441635,0.0001137958,0.0002112507,0.0007785541,0.02448343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003390099,0.0006729079,0.005108589,0.4912171,0.4879469,0.0003999897,0.000325957,0.0002796469,0.0002136483,0.0006379683,0.009732839,0.00007430848],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.003765216,0.9919193,0.0007264399,0.0003386729,0.0002576852,0.001840228,0.0006693819,0.00002070876,0.0004623389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06011573,0.9317304,0.003614252,0.0006323981,0.0001209588,0.003145227,0.0003417641,0.00001672333,0.0002826547],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01687633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08578652,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0676546772973428,"score_gpt":0.4544547612306076,"score_spread":0.3868000839332648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}