{"id":"W2080578317","doi":"10.1080/17480930.2011.613567","title":"Tracer tests to evaluate hydraulic residence time in limestone drains: Case study of the Lorraine site, Latulipe, Québec, Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Mining Reclamation and Environment","topic":"Mine drainage and remediation techniques","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Wildlife; Polytechnique Montréal; Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Effluent; TRACER; Residence time (fluid dynamics); Environmental science; Residence; Water quality; Drainage; Hydrology (agriculture); Residence time distribution; Acid mine drainage; Geology; Environmental engineering; Geotechnical engineering; Mineralogy; Materials science; Metallurgy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005235454,0.00008950776,0.0001262382,0.0000813517,0.00004313415,0.00000944803,0.0002116871,0.00002801891,0.0006959665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001389596,0.00006486244,0.00002620614,0.00008694098,0.00004776665,0.0001475386,0.0001249672,0.00009999711,0.0000088895],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003257001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005567425,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1352968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2267042,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986476,0.00009392312,0.0004679963,0.0001231693,0.0005815545,0.00008576988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993852,0.00007485195,0.0003408511,0.0001165294,0.00002153183,0.00006100168],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005735606,0.003151555,0.4624588,0.00003005721,0.0002867931,0.004615558,0.2611828,0.03275625,0.1201228,0.00001674248,0.02260459,0.09220053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002723726,0.001190819,0.9543439,0.0003100175,0.00008922115,0.002243751,0.0129134,0.004346906,0.01792572,0.0001620668,0.003297395,0.0004530697],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975399,0.00003385401,0.00004399484,0.001416468,0.00008082812,0.0001804187,0.000001937444,0.000002806713,0.0006998318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983929,0.00002788066,0.0008687544,0.0002699558,0.00002609008,0.000006744584,5.764237e-7,0.000006376811,0.0004006773],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4918852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8704613,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01735800748161459,"score_gpt":0.2461814169596744,"score_spread":0.2288234094780598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}