{"id":"W2080656355","doi":"10.1007/s001680200076","title":"A comparison of impact measures from hybrid and synthetic techniques: A case study of the Foothills Model Forest","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Annals of Regional Science","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Foothills; Robustness (evolution); Purchasing; Econometrics; Computer science; Data collection; Regional science; Operations research; Economics; Statistics; Geography; Mathematics; Operations management; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008611709,0.0001155464,0.0002158798,0.0000301593,0.0002169792,0.00001190267,0.0006260063,0.000020551,0.00005093093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001320462,0.00005990936,0.00008369893,0.000298093,0.003284521,0.0002047005,0.0003898533,0.00009528281,8.932651e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004935857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000170495,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005304234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003147972,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99839,0.0001022721,0.0002799128,0.000230348,0.0007829511,0.0002145334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989698,0.0001315737,0.0002408982,0.0005474414,0.0000260855,0.00008420604],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007853723,0.002125326,0.9151732,0.00001489529,0.00003033615,0.00001304376,0.01861893,0.02349155,0.02750455,0.0000700103,0.0007923272,0.01208728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004553854,0.001610592,0.7639808,0.00008848511,0.00007492077,0.0002491759,0.01481823,0.1198459,0.0876262,0.01083353,0.00007065337,0.000346145],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985627,0.0001398976,0.00006871048,0.0004648534,0.000006306194,0.0004134375,0.00001409769,0.000005264389,0.0003247634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997663,0.00002728653,0.0001061377,0.00006127467,0.000003462016,0.000007019508,1.006098e-7,0.000004323607,0.00002412951],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1511924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999428,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1336496108356061,"score_gpt":0.3715520341035699,"score_spread":0.2379024232679638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}