{"id":"W2080797594","doi":"10.1080/10919391003711050","title":"Rigor and Relevance: The Application of The Critical Incident Technique to Investigate Email Usage","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce","topic":"Personal Information Management and User Behavior","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Computer science; Critical Incident Technique; Domain (mathematical analysis); Field (mathematics); Qualitative research; Data science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2475367,0.001160315,0.001581379,0.01748026,0.005666234,0.007682851,0.00303367,0.002856978,0.002528503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5577269,0.001144631,0.00141653,0.01037497,0.01347712,0.01126244,0.008454736,0.00375878,0.0004315739],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00531471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01069444,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001868444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002034433,"domain_scores_codex":[0.6070787,0.3233378,0.01640624,0.007134201,0.04418832,0.00185477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2166764,0.6811225,0.03499697,0.03164008,0.03415412,0.001409964],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009463411,0.0007077135,0.07493459,0.007408726,0.0005489042,0.0006126498,0.301787,0.002164528,0.006635638,0.0913576,0.004792849,0.5081034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007226054,0.005087341,0.2159387,0.01088319,0.0007975037,0.003159303,0.2864443,0.03233211,0.01959675,0.3516669,0.07218875,0.001182512],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3155538,0.002594321,0.5960384,0.007303406,0.0006536085,0.01595544,0.0004435313,0.0004779458,0.06097956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.799607,0.0007016776,0.1880791,0.0009867398,0.000238949,0.009011673,0.0001005883,0.0001239382,0.001150219],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2475367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9279212,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04417967570834656,"score_gpt":0.3807714365355017,"score_spread":0.3365917608271551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}