{"id":"W2080801908","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2451.2009.01695.x","title":"From political emergencies and states of exception to exceptional states and emergent politics: a neo‐Durkheimian alternative to Agamben","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Social Science Journal","topic":"Philosophy, Sociology, Political Theory","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Sovereignty; Sociology; State of exception; Contingency; State (computer science); Normative; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001315494,0.000288724,0.000376194,0.001124022,0.004057979,0.005292681,0.0007059046,0.001940592,0.001963648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002145917,0.0001818422,0.0002696956,0.0006538978,0.02925122,0.006982679,0.004056127,0.004328092,0.0002325057],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004498085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00186512,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003093309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004396357,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990317,0.0005152241,0.00002736602,0.0001306806,0.0001429941,0.0001520119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999246,0.0003985621,0.00008641634,0.0001266311,0.00006908661,0.00007337467],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003386319,0.000002178122,0.00005462397,0.000006533716,5.541352e-7,0.00002028198,0.002311881,0.00005158138,0.00002097083,0.9960663,0.0004099968,0.001051787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005361771,0.000005623227,0.0002298641,0.00004227443,0.000001634222,0.00005198039,0.001705336,0.0002607435,0.00004331769,0.9445508,0.05309865,0.000004339474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1017322,0.01367279,0.0396275,0.05216489,0.0008018649,0.00004499537,0.00008059878,0.00007919619,0.791796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9778,0.001534959,0.005005332,0.002293622,0.0002065418,0.00005953509,0.00002859112,0.00002962418,0.0130418],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005292681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03263599,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0319782808983296,"score_gpt":0.3809987984980581,"score_spread":0.3490205175997285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}