{"id":"W2080801908","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2451.2009.01695.x","title":"From political emergencies and states of exception to exceptional states and emergent politics: a neo‐Durkheimian alternative to Agamben","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Social Science Journal","topic":"Philosophy, Sociology, Political Theory","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Sovereignty; Sociology; State of exception; Contingency; State (computer science); Normative; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001372222,0.0001610357,0.0002302218,0.0003082327,0.001110927,0.0002090378,0.0005250362,0.00009051481,0.0004801301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007024783,0.0001576032,0.00008111862,0.0002938244,0.002657357,0.0005106275,0.000240438,0.0002230758,0.00002145855],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006972969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003002491,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01331915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004290003,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969527,0.0002107771,0.0004933328,0.0003495009,0.001258469,0.0007352752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980901,0.0002552304,0.0001643105,0.00006601394,0.0007370936,0.0006871749],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003000127,0.00008963088,0.00971292,0.000002248687,0.00003756514,0.000004692807,0.01723212,0.00004343921,0.003335198,0.9672242,0.0009536261,0.001334366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002041018,0.00008674867,0.1328469,0.00002193942,0.00001398018,0.000005442562,0.0112377,0.00006695598,0.0003706855,0.8510846,0.00387814,0.0001827961],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9508154,0.00004028853,0.001276705,0.03535431,0.001074509,0.0001571859,0.0002464206,0.00002145204,0.01101378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928981,0.00006715897,0.0009142044,0.001076378,0.004776259,0.000009737515,0.00001174522,0.00001035718,0.0002360752],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.123134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9932513,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0319782808983296,"score_gpt":0.3809987984980581,"score_spread":0.3490205175997285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}