{"id":"W2080890053","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2007.0011","title":"Public Reason and Moral Compromise","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Praise; Politics; Compromise; Epistemology; Criticism; Doctrine; Philosophy; Public reason; Law; Sociology; Political science; Democracy; Social psychology; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0246063,0.0006730442,0.0011837,0.002386427,0.01135817,0.01890358,0.00231752,0.01753644,0.01180534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03605183,0.0005110891,0.001346042,0.001653796,0.05193893,0.01656241,0.01106932,0.01239325,0.001700236],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01540937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007950106,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003563545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003135241,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9753497,0.01396847,0.0006947781,0.003354768,0.003739911,0.002892282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9797673,0.01229424,0.001445618,0.00313636,0.002383047,0.0009734993],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002874424,0.000003861646,0.00002500678,0.000007507903,0.000003163742,0.00001463258,0.0003908806,0.00009305671,0.000008780952,0.9970039,0.001597787,0.0008487597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008273811,0.000002912577,0.00002753921,0.00002955287,0.000002953609,0.00001830809,0.0002326638,0.000183112,0.00003695162,0.979293,0.0201599,0.00000477913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01588332,0.006403396,0.03066162,0.1502333,0.001256687,0.00006355473,0.00005518587,0.0001111719,0.7953318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9393884,0.001599793,0.005503173,0.01134759,0.001132917,0.0001205644,0.00004161488,0.0001397372,0.04072613],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0246063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1301321,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1459050818559063,"score_gpt":0.3165623061178905,"score_spread":0.1706572242619842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}