{"id":"W2080921757","doi":"10.1007/s00221-004-1905-2","title":"When two eyes are better than one in prehension: monocular viewing and end-point variance","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Experimental Brain Research","topic":"Motor Control and Adaptation","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Monocular; Monocular vision; Binocular vision; Psychology; Computer vision; Kinematics; Perception; Depth perception; Artificial intelligence; Cognitive psychology; Communication; Computer science; Neuroscience; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001381021,0.0003622858,0.0005905993,0.0005650176,0.0002985166,0.001265841,0.0003619874,0.0009253222,0.002155998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01856061,0.0002980139,0.0003039533,0.0005043554,0.0007838077,0.001274261,0.0006099374,0.0006729563,0.0001862469],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003692498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003033052,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003613786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004198861,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992216,0.0002207732,0.00006551491,0.000186392,0.0001836872,0.0001220851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899594,0.007446908,0.001464943,0.0005132991,0.0003321865,0.0002832892],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01665231,0.0009927321,0.3052618,0.0003345557,0.0005783009,0.001241218,0.002446114,0.01278612,0.5493553,0.01191766,0.001312551,0.09712134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001022377,0.0003662382,0.9530999,0.00002322154,0.00008623201,0.000609223,0.0006670208,0.02033053,0.01307044,0.0114197,0.0001607815,0.00006438346],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971424,0.0001143759,0.001719477,0.0000724333,0.000006789295,0.000005680664,0.00005351548,0.00001176741,0.0008735679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992664,0.0000290782,0.0004454381,0.00001927969,0.000005791602,0.000004665828,0.00004907679,0.00001265925,0.0001675815],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003613786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007303655,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1182243803930495,"score_gpt":0.3756272141669511,"score_spread":0.2574028337739016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}