{"id":"W2080921757","doi":"10.1007/s00221-004-1905-2","title":"When two eyes are better than one in prehension: monocular viewing and end-point variance","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Experimental Brain Research","topic":"Motor Control and Adaptation","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Monocular; Monocular vision; Binocular vision; Psychology; Computer vision; Kinematics; Perception; Depth perception; Artificial intelligence; Cognitive psychology; Communication; Computer science; Neuroscience; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000650639,0.0001261149,0.0001656949,0.000161393,0.0002185479,0.0001311784,0.0001983166,0.00004502377,0.0001578596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003042785,0.0001201611,0.00003469192,0.0002181576,0.0001825752,0.00035484,0.0002106058,0.0003101927,0.00005435247],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001343404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003730624,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004109178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000324428,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977691,0.0004003652,0.00019976,0.0005374706,0.0006499435,0.0004433827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992661,0.0003105314,0.00003837013,0.0002410094,0.0000259051,0.0001181094],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006019208,0.0002005211,0.0003305931,0.00001186289,0.000002531388,0.0001125814,0.003339878,0.00003259869,0.9922239,0.001755483,0.00003710605,0.001892812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003070407,0.0002645248,0.01800697,0.0002238652,0.000001189382,0.00001908263,0.001214868,0.001283944,0.9676699,0.006284044,0.001725848,0.000235323],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872074,0.001133734,0.0003238059,0.00985464,0.00006605731,0.0005711667,0.000004094406,0.00003291289,0.0008061763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968104,0.00002396684,0.001334049,0.001359414,0.0001071049,0.0001246502,0.000001774054,0.00001892051,0.0002196912],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02455391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4900026,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1182243803930495,"score_gpt":0.3756272141669511,"score_spread":0.2574028337739016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}