{"id":"W2081016518","doi":"10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.02.118","title":"Sorption and stability of mercury on activated carbon for emission control","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hazardous Materials","topic":"Mercury impact and mitigation studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mercury (programming language); Sorbent; Activated carbon; Sorption; Chemistry; Flue gas; Sulfur; Environmental chemistry; Elemental mercury; Leaching (pedology); Inorganic chemistry; Adsorption; Organic chemistry; Environmental science; Soil water","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003333309,0.0002875537,0.0002449919,0.0004072048,0.0007225668,0.0003798025,0.0003638918,0.000465424,0.001374917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006839363,0.0001602769,0.0002807715,0.0002573546,0.0003363313,0.0002958389,0.0002068449,0.0003830589,0.0002897639],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006146946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005028117,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007645711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009844886,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996384,0.00004337067,0.00001469786,0.00004702363,0.0001642496,0.0000922844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996887,0.00008553154,0.00002543932,0.00002246106,0.0001398349,0.00003806422],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006457254,0.000117213,0.0009236521,0.00004675733,0.0000178889,0.0000518152,0.00007715143,0.0009243421,0.9931188,0.00009975438,0.0001110608,0.003865923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009210558,0.0004111893,0.003376633,0.000002960849,0.00001112151,0.00003331264,0.00005860221,0.003086622,0.9925582,0.00002710081,0.0004157238,0.00000932281],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990696,0.0001522809,0.0002463249,0.00002330287,0.000009504207,0.000006259065,0.00004648653,0.000009323196,0.0004368598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983759,0.0001179169,0.0002770699,0.000007599129,0.000006358708,0.000004988732,0.00008301125,0.000008795686,0.001118475],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007645711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01520246,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01695519990750674,"score_gpt":0.2665200196467124,"score_spread":0.2495648197392057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}