{"id":"W2081016518","doi":"10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.02.118","title":"Sorption and stability of mercury on activated carbon for emission control","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hazardous Materials","topic":"Mercury impact and mitigation studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mercury (programming language); Sorbent; Activated carbon; Sorption; Chemistry; Flue gas; Sulfur; Environmental chemistry; Elemental mercury; Leaching (pedology); Inorganic chemistry; Adsorption; Organic chemistry; Environmental science; Soil water","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000632359,0.00008110436,0.0002841455,0.0000287588,0.00004158315,0.00001359425,0.00004942684,0.00004171355,0.0001698033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001697361,0.00005639311,0.00003778677,0.0000336,0.00005013562,0.0001032196,0.000009482672,0.00003507957,9.813187e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005347223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000101333,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001225196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.851782e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991884,0.00007182337,0.0003776943,0.00007567151,0.0001831771,0.0001032197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993543,0.00007328637,0.0004106294,0.00006906874,0.00003405724,0.00005864779],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005945568,0.00005805845,0.001256467,0.00001148773,0.00001317034,7.041355e-7,0.0002273448,0.000008815906,0.9954001,0.000006997062,0.0004320249,0.001990278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009170478,0.0007362675,0.03612575,0.00003825824,0.00003255871,0.00001019147,0.00007861684,0.000006930277,0.9611057,0.0006926678,0.0001980321,0.00005800279],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.998724,0.00003204338,0.00004774862,0.000519241,0.0001603554,0.0001797523,0.00001739751,0.000004408806,0.0003150491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999695,0.00004226139,0.00008757505,0.00009800962,0.00005736144,0.000001383291,8.121623e-7,0.000003865123,0.00001375365],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03486928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2299645,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01695519990750674,"score_gpt":0.2665200196467124,"score_spread":0.2495648197392057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}