{"id":"W2081066029","doi":"10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2005.10.014","title":"Kinematic, static and dynamic analysis of a planar 2-DOF tensegrity mechanism","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mechanism and Machine Theory","topic":"Structural Analysis and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Tensegrity; Statics; Kinematics; Workspace; Mechanism (biology); Planar; Stiffness; Actuator; Static analysis; Computer science; Inverse kinematics; Control theory (sociology); Cartesian coordinate system; Quadrilateral; Screw theory; Topology (electrical circuits); Structural engineering; Engineering; Mathematics; Classical mechanics; Physics; Geometry; Control (management); Robot; Finite element method; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002608439,0.0003730938,0.0004368109,0.0007384053,0.0003075041,0.0003535158,0.0007058138,0.0005834898,0.004020324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005918127,0.0002795852,0.0004720053,0.0004448994,0.0005796824,0.0003281378,0.0004179149,0.0001820702,0.0004252116],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002010408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003912206,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001676424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001184063,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999064,0.00001862495,0.00000391291,0.00001699023,0.00003688908,0.00001714548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999869,0.00004132869,0.00004176365,0.00001616413,0.0000226585,0.00000908354],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001957199,0.00004366299,0.00119276,0.0000874909,0.00003506814,0.000432758,0.00009277331,0.9195433,0.03348213,0.02162904,0.0003434799,0.02292178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002776005,0.0001937791,0.002721179,0.000009460775,0.00002067403,0.0002119121,0.0000576131,0.988976,0.001979805,0.004431523,0.001344225,0.00002602404],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5458226,0.0005312723,0.431037,0.0002448022,0.00004050448,0.0000918201,0.0002416137,0.0004316714,0.02155872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840471,0.0001761783,0.01004899,0.0000184639,0.00001241615,0.00004044765,0.00006234211,0.00001397991,0.005580032],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004020324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01344937,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.003967144062837423,"score_gpt":0.1926898582082174,"score_spread":0.1887227141453799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}