{"id":"W2081066029","doi":"10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2005.10.014","title":"Kinematic, static and dynamic analysis of a planar 2-DOF tensegrity mechanism","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mechanism and Machine Theory","topic":"Structural Analysis and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Tensegrity; Statics; Kinematics; Workspace; Mechanism (biology); Planar; Stiffness; Actuator; Static analysis; Computer science; Inverse kinematics; Control theory (sociology); Cartesian coordinate system; Quadrilateral; Screw theory; Topology (electrical circuits); Structural engineering; Engineering; Mathematics; Classical mechanics; Physics; Geometry; Control (management); Robot; Finite element method; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002724186,0.0001564597,0.000379842,0.0002818464,0.00005244424,0.00001793565,0.00006366314,0.00005298453,0.0001793562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000172909,0.0001225062,0.00006960384,0.0002781475,0.00002465278,0.00008172738,0.00002364355,0.00007994632,0.000001436214],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001460759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000285784,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002280733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001150436,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992964,0.00004831053,0.0002500468,0.0001549312,0.0001138841,0.0001363793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996349,0.00006680307,0.00005603748,0.0001544174,0.00002365114,0.00006415859],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005523161,0.00004337542,0.00007936559,0.0003447239,0.002502898,0.000007492374,0.001928697,0.04027754,0.04598824,0.8795275,0.00001410457,0.02923082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002320893,0.00002746855,0.000636041,0.00001065613,0.001163397,0.00000660781,0.000131458,0.8404668,0.002380824,0.1547968,0.000005700399,0.0001421562],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5225679,0.0006231575,0.476249,0.00006332915,0.00003437738,0.0001075933,0.00007749905,0.00008156936,0.0001956228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869415,0.0004461064,0.01238897,0.00005625964,0.0000104747,0.000004724825,0.00005936057,0.00001513452,0.00007753834],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8001893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.499566,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.003967144062837423,"score_gpt":0.1926898582082174,"score_spread":0.1887227141453799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}