{"id":"W2081132054","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-7976.2005.00408.x","title":"Spatial Yield Risk Across Region, Crop and Aggregation Method","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie","topic":"Agricultural Economics and Policy","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Yield (engineering); Distortion (music); Aggregate (composite); Crop insurance; Data aggregator; Range (aeronautics); Aggregate data; Crop; Spatial analysis; Frost (temperature); Measure (data warehouse); Econometrics; Environmental science; Agriculture; Statistics; Mathematics; Geography; Computer science; Forestry; Engineering; Meteorology; Data mining","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019023,0.0007339039,0.000984156,0.002403899,0.0008393739,0.0018839,0.002565252,0.0007769994,0.004949435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05184219,0.0003928654,0.00187402,0.005622576,0.001570721,0.001149792,0.002106633,0.001111973,0.0006872742],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002896802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002741427,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08611154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04586529,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9857041,0.005931322,0.00117295,0.002885315,0.00347153,0.0008347371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9798213,0.00870568,0.002925976,0.005628234,0.00268056,0.0002382961],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001175717,0.0002169191,0.5271468,0.0005443229,0.002351516,0.0008577068,0.004700859,0.1004387,0.002588788,0.1014514,0.01443524,0.2440919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000195441,0.0007376125,0.5608719,0.000325828,0.001385554,0.001590658,0.003804456,0.272777,0.007648077,0.07351708,0.07682415,0.0003222845],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3006065,0.001620281,0.6638005,0.0007846429,0.0002282285,0.003015297,0.01204286,0.001207457,0.01669413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8339661,0.0005627791,0.1471801,0.0001321549,0.00007670481,0.002025387,0.005874035,0.0001753992,0.0100074],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08611154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1712207,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02567855896969772,"score_gpt":0.1921142511875201,"score_spread":0.1664356922178223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}