{"id":"W2081135434","doi":"10.1109/tmi.2004.839362","title":"A comparison of human and model observers in multislice LROC studies","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging","topic":"Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications","field":"Medicine","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Lawson Health Research Institute","funders":"National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering","keywords":"Observer (physics); Channelized; Iterative reconstruction; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Noise (video); Channel (broadcasting); Computer vision; Multislice; Single-photon emission computed tomography; Imaging phantom; Mathematics; Algorithm; Pattern recognition (psychology); Image (mathematics); Nuclear medicine; Optics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0200258,0.0006447438,0.0006513144,0.001007742,0.0004389731,0.001193955,0.0007099633,0.0009869129,0.001503877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07621982,0.0003579932,0.0004317432,0.0004140847,0.001012702,0.001306439,0.0012476,0.0004476197,0.0005099589],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004738367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003347343,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001418028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002386607,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9887003,0.007379111,0.0007396158,0.001687257,0.001179192,0.0003144919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9198673,0.05541803,0.004007093,0.009523181,0.01026503,0.0009193106],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.03397568,0.001654396,0.3763317,0.002238126,0.002777383,0.001799273,0.02888637,0.02678745,0.1608684,0.004147579,0.004401134,0.3561324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001548594,0.01797958,0.6799977,0.0005180525,0.002504961,0.007310729,0.009742267,0.1487621,0.1063824,0.00825971,0.01625652,0.0007374788],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8957176,0.001408807,0.09840635,0.0001290507,0.0001406326,0.0002298135,0.0002682662,0.0003737395,0.003325803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863012,0.0001934647,0.01210145,0.0001116755,0.00002795449,0.0001375773,0.0002779615,0.000152482,0.0006962799],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9799742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1059079,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08879706243207076,"score_gpt":0.4361299947599186,"score_spread":0.3473329323278479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}