{"id":"W2081215000","doi":"10.1080/1055678021000039175","title":"A dynamic large-update primal‐dual interior-point method for linear optimization","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Optimization methods & software","topic":"Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Duality gap; Duality (order theory); Interior point method; Path (computing); Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Dual (grammatical number); Function (biology); Simple (philosophy); Optimization problem; Point (geometry); Power (physics); Computer science; Discrete mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008748423,0.0006897072,0.0009213116,0.0003800117,0.0003876173,0.0007237224,0.001333854,0.0009620489,0.002382098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002146911,0.0004373013,0.0006833434,0.0004234581,0.0007265845,0.001034678,0.001690537,0.00176747,0.0004852456],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005170758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009068944,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001110849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008770616,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996514,0.0001414213,0.00001362528,0.0000675842,0.0001022618,0.00002376051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996316,0.0001937698,0.00004160155,0.00004086181,0.00006163451,0.00003051391],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085539,0.00008960522,0.0004036736,0.0001417,0.0000382685,0.0001008209,0.0001117437,0.849178,0.003961597,0.0774078,0.002839103,0.06564222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006010862,0.0000147148,0.00001458395,0.000002856144,0.00000190754,0.000008774909,0.000002630891,0.9963415,0.0002396048,0.002747668,0.0006171624,0.000002478819],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002740182,0.00009181552,0.9956213,0.00008478074,0.00002726176,0.0000270452,0.00001102818,0.0000813958,0.001315146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2735042,0.0003167446,0.7200912,0.0001644634,0.0001159891,0.0004432198,0.0001186102,0.0001647802,0.005080694],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002382098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007968903,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05516734349933614,"score_gpt":0.4375199633420161,"score_spread":0.3823526198426799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}