{"id":"W2081235119","doi":"10.1139/cjfas-57-2-307","title":"Relationship of wooded riparian zones and runoff potential to fish community composition in agricultural streams","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Riparian zone; STREAMS; Surface runoff; Environmental science; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Ecology; Hydrology (agriculture); Drainage basin; Agriculture; Fishery; Geography; Habitat; Biology; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002495076,0.00009533497,0.0001123256,0.0005149235,0.0002947831,0.000366348,0.0001503139,0.0001975686,0.0008066815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007456701,0.0001510713,0.000115939,0.0002958936,0.0003541616,0.0002084832,0.0002900555,0.0001389298,0.0001088933],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004892654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002759458,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02286604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08521587,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998777,0.00002771107,0.00001139653,0.00003381889,0.00001836388,0.00003095444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994987,0.00009998703,0.0001606212,0.00001436228,0.00007056367,0.0001557126],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001005171,0.00002299196,0.9968168,0.000004947636,0.00002354028,0.00003685096,0.0002073372,0.00009469405,0.001333131,0.00001545429,0.00003066012,0.00131301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001222313,0.0000171816,0.9997041,9.787116e-7,0.00000245434,0.00001346361,0.000100644,0.0001009512,0.00003034895,0.000006618861,0.00002123347,7.647362e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998829,0.00001863515,0.00000897142,0.000003560627,2.608979e-7,6.266654e-7,0.00002804838,3.470086e-7,0.0000566407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997891,0.00001863923,0.00002810808,0.000004888012,9.834806e-7,0.00000164999,0.00006467397,4.149655e-7,0.00009164295],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.977134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04546589,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01417040202368548,"score_gpt":0.2014452519074607,"score_spread":0.1872748498837752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}