{"id":"W2081237013","doi":"10.4236/jwarp.2013.58a007","title":"Arsenic in Drinking Water Toxicological Risk Assessment in the North Region of Burkina Faso","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Water Resource and Protection","topic":"Arsenic contamination and mitigation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue","funders":"","keywords":"Arsenic; Environmental health; Arsenic toxicity; Arsenic contamination of groundwater; Arsenic poisoning; Risk assessment; Health risk assessment; Toxicology; Exposure assessment; Health hazard; Health effect; Hazard; Health risk; Human health; Medicine; Environmental science; Biology; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007325871,0.0002005411,0.0001264467,0.0006724868,0.000487275,0.0005633209,0.0001449149,0.0002293105,0.0003732643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008984156,0.0001326315,0.0001374099,0.0005635856,0.0001933617,0.0003206123,0.0003757245,0.0001117828,0.00004848221],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001120658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009390747,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07624976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09510795,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997172,0.0001661315,0.00001633076,0.00002834655,0.00003845514,0.0000335388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997415,0.00007243466,0.00009369531,0.000008565013,0.00006770525,0.00001611291],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002666576,0.0001417901,0.8955958,0.0002371772,0.0001153063,0.00205496,0.003983531,0.008512638,0.01590633,0.00123584,0.000289477,0.07166044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006378092,0.00118742,0.9252694,0.0003181749,0.0002435097,0.002617649,0.02078754,0.01964866,0.01054406,0.002851826,0.01641151,0.00005649233],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967108,0.0007013621,0.000718868,0.0001589307,0.000002042118,0.00004491121,0.00006781094,0.000005615704,0.001589605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976521,0.0006109855,0.001108208,0.00003040586,0.000001347049,0.000015254,0.0000334204,7.710836e-7,0.0005475917],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07624976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1516119,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01344338397108109,"score_gpt":0.2196414248531404,"score_spread":0.2061980408820593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}