{"id":"W2081239405","doi":"10.1016/j.virusres.2005.02.004","title":"Nucleotide sequence analysis of Plum pox virus isolate W3174: Evidence of a new strain","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Virus Research","topic":"Plant Virus Research Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Food Inspection Agency","funders":"Canadian Food Inspection Agency","keywords":"Biology; Nucleic acid sequence; Nucleotide; Virology; Genetics; Genome; Phylogenetic tree; Untranslated region; Virus; Strain (injury); Potyvirus; Whole genome sequencing; Nucleic acid; Sequence analysis; Peptide sequence; Plant virus; Gene; RNA","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001058832,0.0005780637,0.0003741462,0.0005985884,0.000649243,0.0003932109,0.0003337108,0.0006058239,0.002168929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005070142,0.000175155,0.0003679019,0.000509196,0.0003660746,0.0002348956,0.0001817916,0.000700372,0.001143954],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003947225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005465507,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005040208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004550561,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998975,0.0000140084,0.000009384994,0.00002051197,0.00002833161,0.00003024704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995213,0.0001443031,0.00006849322,0.0000427219,0.0001017716,0.0001214777],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003929197,0.0001567821,0.002809846,0.00007681009,0.00002657766,0.001201288,0.0002235117,0.0001356438,0.9913203,0.0002568749,0.0002703671,0.00312904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002412719,0.004338305,0.3142403,0.00007704726,0.000357244,0.009472204,0.002068096,0.003175693,0.6402459,0.0008050145,0.02485996,0.0001189185],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959138,0.0002052611,0.001004758,0.00007544497,0.00007339024,0.00008634776,0.0008497757,0.00002061705,0.001770682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9813001,0.0004192527,0.003555469,0.0001706752,0.00008363842,0.00009007352,0.01020616,0.00003543899,0.004139233],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005040208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01002175,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2757945435511743,"score_gpt":0.4206021000814488,"score_spread":0.1448075565302745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}