{"id":"W2081239405","doi":"10.1016/j.virusres.2005.02.004","title":"Nucleotide sequence analysis of Plum pox virus isolate W3174: Evidence of a new strain","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Virus Research","topic":"Plant Virus Research Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Food Inspection Agency","funders":"Canadian Food Inspection Agency","keywords":"Biology; Nucleic acid sequence; Nucleotide; Virology; Genetics; Genome; Phylogenetic tree; Untranslated region; Virus; Strain (injury); Potyvirus; Whole genome sequencing; Nucleic acid; Sequence analysis; Peptide sequence; Plant virus; Gene; RNA","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00258825,0.0001878192,0.000564033,0.0002809322,0.0002612592,0.00006751358,0.001121489,0.0001163772,0.001593298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001419457,0.00008210346,0.0002710571,0.004575041,0.000552741,0.0003565831,0.0005330862,0.0004723544,0.0001579542],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001102303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001192896,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02271446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03822493,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959252,0.0003998722,0.0005507679,0.0005292347,0.001724294,0.0008705575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996888,0.001913634,0.0001521264,0.0002323039,0.0005087623,0.0003051022],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002006974,0.0001144083,0.0009636765,0.0000226386,0.0002996962,0.00001104598,0.0003107001,0.000142038,0.9531862,0.00009322814,0.001217132,0.0434385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004719794,0.001977477,0.5037074,0.0005148604,0.0002820912,0.000005841838,0.001256497,0.007420574,0.4398392,0.0009707992,0.04276747,0.0007858049],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939221,0.002069019,0.000007047579,0.001854548,0.00001596656,0.0003349575,0.001147519,0.00003410912,0.0006147626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940006,0.004430719,0.0002320155,0.000057405,0.0001348685,0.00001567746,0.00001356885,0.000001972197,0.001113215],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.513347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993194,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2757945435511743,"score_gpt":0.4206021000814488,"score_spread":0.1448075565302745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}