{"id":"W2081371535","doi":"10.1016/j.bandc.2004.08.050","title":"Semantic and syntactic aspects of the mass/count distinction: A case study of semantic dementia","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brain and Cognition","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Jewish General Hospital; Université de Montréal; Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Grammaticality; Psychology; Noun; Task (project management); Semantics (computer science); Sentence; Semantic memory; Linguistics; Judgement; Parsing; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Grammar","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001340089,0.003530135,0.001530648,0.006478754,0.007326066,0.003189325,0.00229279,0.007805811,0.003205558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008544339,0.002095964,0.001840408,0.003247645,0.01120934,0.003452352,0.004304398,0.00544326,0.0007901603],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002694395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002258358,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01129313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01299291,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988359,0.0002318346,0.0001478821,0.000216783,0.000191118,0.0003765733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969386,0.001733626,0.0004167154,0.0003013469,0.0001738688,0.0004359513],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001366902,0.0001413868,0.005381069,0.00004258861,0.00001274002,0.9882036,0.002322108,0.00009481028,0.000750537,0.001218226,0.0001128002,0.001583438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000176151,0.00003910085,0.001497449,0.000008868972,0.00001761335,0.995808,0.0007990068,0.0002419025,0.0005188961,0.0008329086,0.0002040072,0.00001457479],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9829108,0.0009844506,0.002164217,0.001923427,0.0001631022,0.0001597333,0.0001959813,0.00005087993,0.0114474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952866,0.0005378266,0.001968013,0.0004178883,0.0002628512,0.00003392197,0.00004810284,0.00004781484,0.001396903],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01129313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0224548,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02249229806146378,"score_gpt":0.2667770409902723,"score_spread":0.2442847429288086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}