{"id":"W2081426401","doi":"10.1023/b:jone.0000022031.16580.5a","title":"Residual Magnetic Flux Leakage: A Possible Tool for Studying Pipeline Defects","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation","topic":"Non-Destructive Testing Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Magnetic flux leakage; Residual; Materials science; Solid mechanics; Magnetic flux; Flux (metallurgy); Leakage (economics); Residual stress; Pipeline (software); Nondestructive testing; Detector; Magnetic field; Mechanics; Acoustics; Structural engineering; Composite material; Optics; Metallurgy; Engineering; Physics; Mechanical engineering; Computer science; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002924806,0.0002424475,0.0003455457,0.0003704373,0.0001131522,0.00007175118,0.0001860299,0.0001124846,0.0001013461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002433752,0.0002385637,0.0001302897,0.0003538834,0.00005504132,0.0005270253,0.000016628,0.0003375308,0.000005276594],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005042493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002458193,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001311577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002365106,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978641,0.0002705974,0.00068769,0.0001914292,0.0006882689,0.0002979311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976199,0.0004142939,0.0003319877,0.0002167612,0.001339289,0.00007774746],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006462003,0.0004255676,0.06495757,0.0007332939,0.0005743567,0.00006788751,0.002958137,0.02170844,0.7769822,0.03368144,0.01055771,0.08670722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005322055,0.002004162,0.1037563,0.0003873126,0.0007703295,0.0008850483,0.0005426081,0.01093426,0.07794617,0.7965289,0.0001203447,0.0008025483],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9195537,0.0005815089,0.0750402,0.00001640296,0.0005873456,0.0008399193,0.000006736339,0.0001319717,0.003242195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6464067,0.000007419525,0.3532768,0.00001013455,0.0001959626,0.0000388132,0.000003294077,0.00004614748,0.00001463929],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7628474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9728347,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04030962852073874,"score_gpt":0.3089354653831248,"score_spread":0.2686258368623861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}