{"id":"W2081489660","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2013.07.003","title":"The flip side of vanity sizing: How consumers respond to and compensate for larger than expected clothing sizes","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Clothing; Sizing; Consumption (sociology); Marketing; Advertising; Business; Work (physics); Sociology; Law; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001301909,0.0001654078,0.0001630823,0.0002473015,0.0005027161,0.001953873,0.000280239,0.0009293279,0.004490985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007407458,0.0001764611,0.0002211632,0.0001447529,0.0009450782,0.001151475,0.0006205033,0.0009181236,0.0004133788],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003371565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002553889,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001085927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001514532,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994599,0.0002601644,0.00001544034,0.00006780836,0.0001269202,0.0000697404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982962,0.0007581057,0.0003503301,0.0001934273,0.0002293733,0.0001725786],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002646195,0.001600469,0.5148159,0.0004111715,0.0002563371,0.001601774,0.07852839,0.00445527,0.1235109,0.02298234,0.006438083,0.2427532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001243251,0.001642811,0.8165295,0.0001464095,0.0001697595,0.0009047728,0.09875526,0.02231527,0.01175434,0.03230427,0.01518015,0.0001732043],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9923591,0.00003539593,0.001036426,0.0004548559,0.00001511455,0.00001220347,0.000008978096,0.00001273299,0.006065165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982244,0.00003049101,0.00068896,0.0001657892,0.000004474993,0.000006254676,0.00001215547,0.000007998442,0.0008594114],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004490985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01502377,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04288231235800721,"score_gpt":0.3050404051013811,"score_spread":0.2621580927433739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}