{"id":"W2081509466","doi":"10.1145/1370788.1370803","title":"Multi-criteria decision analysis for customization of estimation by analogy method AQUA+","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Weighting; Analogy; Computer science; Personalization; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Perspective (graphical); Decision tree; Quality (philosophy); Estimation; Data mining; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Engineering; Systems engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000504094,0.00007462491,0.0001936098,0.0004520362,0.00005417928,0.00002345685,0.0003744696,0.00005448732,0.00002669729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001121706,0.00006842578,0.00008712167,0.001369607,0.00001723285,0.0002585507,0.00007310968,0.00003780886,0.000005799259],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003578921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003130268,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007251726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006568819,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990619,0.00005220797,0.0002400549,0.000258092,0.0002354347,0.0001523434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979962,0.001326766,0.00005526779,0.0003635949,0.0002048195,0.0000534041],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006119771,0.000376806,0.03621888,0.00007067173,0.0004863846,0.000005501846,0.001199365,0.718526,0.0293147,0.001326872,0.02169796,0.1907157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003361125,0.0000378189,0.01899045,0.000002518606,0.00001743591,0.000002748656,0.000001773409,0.9718092,0.008514613,0.00006933109,0.0001492949,0.00006867239],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01565638,0.00003324522,0.9839209,0.00004985569,0.00006801054,0.0001487385,0.00000509161,0.0001084541,0.000009382794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3482378,0.000004595148,0.6516079,0.00001139878,0.000004640382,0.00001221137,0.00001676197,0.000004211969,0.0001004185],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3325815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2790322,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0384598081481618,"score_gpt":0.366510602226555,"score_spread":0.3280507940783932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}