{"id":"W2081565008","doi":"10.1046/j.1439-0418.2001.00543.x","title":"Comparison of a Canadian and a Dutch strain of the parasitoid <i>Aphelinus mali</i> (Hald) (Hym., Aphelinidae) for control of woolly apple aphid <i>Eriosoma lanigerum</i> (Haussmann) (Hom., Aphididae) in the Netherlands: a simulation approach","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Entomology","topic":"Insect-Plant Interactions and Control","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aphelinidae; Biology; Aphid; Aphididae; Biological pest control; Parasitoid; Horticulture; Natural enemies; Botany; Population; PEST analysis; Toxicology; Homoptera; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007373458,0.0001560829,0.000588411,0.0001143187,0.00009749948,0.00001941758,0.0003813064,0.0001667761,0.00004024623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004065588,0.00005973711,0.0001892054,0.0004848261,0.0001139166,0.00005211931,0.000016621,0.0002513834,4.654704e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002060506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005253988,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004556757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02761743,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983223,0.0001554603,0.0008607416,0.0001543799,0.0002318728,0.0002752108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980745,0.0007592675,0.000838568,0.00009431664,0.00016438,0.00006902382],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.009844256,0.002449945,0.3265596,0.0002056834,0.0006753572,0.0000352859,0.01072528,0.0426086,0.551676,0.009008303,0.001928106,0.0442836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02388389,0.01009,0.6928033,0.0004650641,0.001168214,0.002005041,0.05823236,0.08075958,0.01563599,0.009327631,0.1039173,0.001711615],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963787,0.0002340874,0.0003459332,0.001087274,0.0000892019,0.0006567255,0.0001940219,0.000003106826,0.001010931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992389,0.00005145336,0.0001441494,0.0003492103,0.0001524859,0.00002858765,0.0000193848,0.000002330492,0.00001346359],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.53604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.990126,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02084279900404523,"score_gpt":0.257224276235095,"score_spread":0.2363814772310497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}