{"id":"W2081577773","doi":"10.1089/dia.2012.0067","title":"Evaluation of a New Reusable Insulin Pen (ClikSTAR) in Canadian Patients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Receiving Insulin Glargine","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics","topic":"Diabetes Management and Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Manitoba Health; Université de Sherbrooke; University of Toronto","funders":"Sanofi","keywords":"Medicine; Insulin pen; Diabetes mellitus; Insulin glargine; Insulin; Observational study; Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus; Type 2 diabetes; Adverse effect; Type 1 diabetes; Patient satisfaction; Internal medicine; Surgery; Endocrinology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00143218,0.000210716,0.000407791,0.0009359223,0.00006097376,0.0000176851,0.0001968191,0.0002881272,0.0001044327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003442446,0.0001740083,0.00002180604,0.00179813,0.0002071623,0.0001630005,0.00009922941,0.0003708107,0.00002440341],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002335296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000464693,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007558031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002965495,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979156,0.00009633763,0.0003051857,0.0002688359,0.0005242184,0.0008898459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984199,0.0000691997,0.0001127117,0.0004629462,0.0007134717,0.0002218084],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003984304,0.000193637,0.8239533,0.00006071722,0.000251926,5.414262e-7,0.0001522626,0.000004726475,0.0006472879,0.00006056439,0.00007360651,0.1745616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004064698,0.001271743,0.9635903,0.0003092113,0.0007452565,2.200038e-7,0.0001360295,0.002020373,0.004699735,0.001091573,0.0217651,0.0003057789],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9798067,0.01733517,6.750813e-7,0.001116599,0.0001240309,0.0008572277,0.000006532648,0.00005569424,0.0006974165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998105,0.0006254491,0.0006495806,0.0003091448,0.0000400729,0.0000219677,0.00007373885,0.00004280572,0.0001322379],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1742558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7095852,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03342561893339139,"score_gpt":0.2973501538430779,"score_spread":0.2639245349096865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}