{"id":"W2081634320","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.027","title":"Observational studies in systemic reviews of comparative effectiveness: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; McMaster University","funders":"Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; U.S. Food and Drug Administration","keywords":"Observational study; Randomized controlled trial; Medicine; Systematic review; Psychological intervention; Comparative effectiveness research; Observational methods in psychology; Evidence-based medicine; MEDLINE; Inclusion (mineral); Health care; Agency (philosophy); Psychology; Alternative medicine; Nursing; Surgery; Pathology; Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_broad"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6510168,0.003933072,0.01844912,0.01421825,0.003062054,0.009170654,0.007265955,0.01013937,0.00648617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8655117,0.005402955,0.01674686,0.01730696,0.01514865,0.01450237,0.009096703,0.00918781,0.0003428908],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01308495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017131,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01501559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01796502,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1202613,0.7893269,0.05794528,0.009084705,0.02221989,0.001161983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.04716438,0.8947539,0.03417417,0.01540352,0.007764023,0.0007398994],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01017093,0.0004343122,0.03986574,0.3876894,0.2648589,0.0004201024,0.00569712,0.00463578,0.0003221952,0.07217494,0.02857737,0.1851534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02749356,0.004901788,0.06124652,0.3438304,0.2655677,0.001097393,0.003840128,0.01037087,0.001655756,0.2272963,0.05156647,0.001133159],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009017748,0.9380624,0.02243315,0.01846503,0.005642299,0.002652728,0.001411225,0.0001002873,0.002215136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6118319,0.2377253,0.08698366,0.03043425,0.01138856,0.01902486,0.001492051,0.0002574449,0.0008619012],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9815509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4303584,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9738164202290723,"score_gpt":0.8328909882359095,"score_spread":0.1409254319931629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}