{"id":"W2081634320","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.027","title":"Observational studies in systemic reviews of comparative effectiveness: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; McMaster University","funders":"Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; U.S. Food and Drug Administration","keywords":"Observational study; Randomized controlled trial; Medicine; Systematic review; Psychological intervention; Comparative effectiveness research; Observational methods in psychology; Evidence-based medicine; MEDLINE; Inclusion (mineral); Health care; Agency (philosophy); Psychology; Alternative medicine; Nursing; Surgery; Pathology; Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1568004,0.000144232,0.004425917,0.0001267941,0.0002092998,8.507506e-7,0.0002631972,0.0001634716,0.00001934406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.149739,0.00007470077,0.0002460276,0.0003094761,0.001235783,0.0001263597,0.0001072191,0.001241209,0.000009603315],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000213023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001102447,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002516509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002719925,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8742973,0.1152307,0.009544759,0.0002496201,0.0002033804,0.0004741844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7421983,0.2473651,0.009114387,0.0001967064,0.0009161745,0.0002093103],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001271775,0.00007228729,0.9094696,0.002441621,0.00009925657,0.000001631541,0.05579839,0.000006885154,0.000001197721,0.01644198,0.00184185,0.01255353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00431154,0.001646166,0.9687799,0.00203358,0.00002721395,0.00001473785,0.01154833,0.00003346856,9.997536e-7,0.007120672,0.004425186,0.00005827199],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9690671,0.01369428,0.0007633775,0.009220729,0.001485427,0.005447521,0.00001252804,0.000008587128,0.0003004755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9733378,0.006848229,0.006392,0.01265656,0.0002894787,0.0004637519,9.993041e-7,0.000005928026,0.000005286066],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1321344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8682514,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9738164202290723,"score_gpt":0.8328909882359095,"score_spread":0.1409254319931629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}