{"id":"W2081725497","doi":"10.1016/j.spl.2014.09.024","title":"On improved shrinkage estimators for concave loss","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistics & Probability Letters","topic":"Advanced Statistical Methods and Models","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Simons Foundation","keywords":"Shrinkage; Mathematics; Minimax; Monotone polygon; Estimator; Shrinkage estimator; Concave function; Mean squared error; Applied mathematics; Function (biology); Scale (ratio); Scale parameter; Statistics; Mathematical analysis; Minimax estimator; Regular polygon; Mathematical optimization; Geometry; Minimum-variance unbiased estimator","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02221354,0.002617809,0.002415055,0.002189042,0.0006015692,0.002069837,0.003407252,0.003202636,0.004132891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06750968,0.001730886,0.001742493,0.002031851,0.003246078,0.005496453,0.004526481,0.005967859,0.001606782],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001318514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001626986,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001542974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001651667,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934431,0.004148795,0.0003024704,0.0006352682,0.001228168,0.0002421284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9687992,0.02400256,0.001103893,0.002664574,0.002948528,0.0004811321],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004990041,0.0001994424,0.001842406,0.0006972268,0.0003110873,0.0002535665,0.0005655797,0.2931019,0.01107798,0.4405463,0.0120535,0.2388519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006155617,0.00008889525,0.0004810376,0.00007979866,0.00006604176,0.0001263348,0.00002820599,0.8573755,0.002311414,0.1351584,0.004170118,0.00005276325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002807952,0.0004061981,0.9957619,0.0001621261,0.00006503473,0.0000251048,0.00003683517,0.0001277769,0.0006070879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0983943,0.002399595,0.8862289,0.0007413632,0.0008562025,0.0004006115,0.000764963,0.0008300986,0.009383854],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02221354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1174778,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05889437658964506,"score_gpt":0.3804614542186376,"score_spread":0.3215670776289926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}